Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Matthew Hulme vs Luke Simkiss Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Hulme vs Simkiss analysis and find out who is favored!
Matthew Hulme vs Luke Simkiss Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Hulme 1 - 0 Simkiss
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Hulme has won 52.39% of points on their second serve, while Simkiss has won 45.51%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Hulme, in recent form, has won 46.49% of their opponent's second serve points, while Simkiss has won 45.39%. The same stats for first serve returns are 28.48% and 26.21% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Hulme has saved 65% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Simkiss has saved 57.45% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Hulme has won 56.25% of matches played (W/L 36/ 28), with Simkiss winning 44.44% (W/L 16/ 20) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Hulme has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 60% (W/L 3/ 2), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2). Simkiss has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 60% (W/L 3/ 2), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 20% (W/L 2/ 8).
- Player level: In the last year, Hulme has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 56.9% of matches (W/L 33/ 25), where as Simkiss has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 44.44% of matches (W/L 16/ 20). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Hulme winning 1 times and Simkiss being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Hulme winning 2 and Simkiss winning 1. The last match between Hulme and Simkiss was at the M25 Nottingham, 24-04-2024, First, Hard with Matthew Hulme getting the victory 4-6 6-4 7-5.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:15:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Hulme and Simkiss have played a deciding set 1 times, with Hulme winning 1 times and Simkiss 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Hulme winning 0, and Simkiss 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Hulme has played against opponents with an average rank of 118.39 while Simkiss has played against players with an average rank of 154.08.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Hulme has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Simkiss has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Hulme has converted 37.88% of breakpoint opportunities, and Simkiss has converted 30% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
850
Rank
835
High
25
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
868
Rank
830
High
25
Age
Plays
L
W
W
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
Form
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
51% (54-51)
Career Total W/L
49% (47-48)
57% (24-18)
YTD W/L
11% (1-8)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Matthew Hulme vs Luke Simkiss For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Hulme VS Simkiss
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Matthew Hulme | Luke Simkiss |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 17 | 15 |
| Aces (Total) | 9 | 2 |
| DFs Total | 2 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:15:0 | 2:15:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 76% (77/101) | 71% (66/93) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 74% (57/77) | 68% (45/66) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 42% (10/24) | 56% (15/27) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (3/6) | 25% (2/8) |
| Return Points W% | 35% (33/93) | 34% (34/101) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 6-4 7-5 |
Stats 
Matthew Hulme
Player
Luke Simkiss
76%
(
77 of
101)
1st Serve %
71%
(
66 of
93)
9
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
74%
(
57 of
77)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
45 of
66)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
34%
(
34 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
33 of
93)
100
Total Points Won
94
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Matthew Hulme | Luke Simkiss |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 57% (24/18) | 11% (1/8) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 55% (57/46) | 27% (6/16) |
| Games Win/Loss | 52% (535/502) | 46% (106/122) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 58% (21/15) | 17% (1/5) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 60% (3/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.43 | 0.13 |
| Aces Total | 216 | 14 |
| DFs per game | 0.16 | 0.11 |
| DFs Total | 82 | 12 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:32:31 | 1:16:46 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 107.64 | 76.56 |
| 1st Serve % | 68% (1880/2760) | 63% (285/452) |
| 1st Serve W% | 70% (1316/1880) | 68% (193/285) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 52% (461/880) | 46% (76/167) |
| BPs Won% Total | 38% (75/198) | 30% (9/30) |
| Return Pts W% | 35% (948/2715) | 32% (140/431) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 60% (3/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 57% (21/16) | 11% (1/8) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 56% (23/41) | 11% (1/9) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 40% (8/20) | 0% (0/2) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (9/18) | 0% (0/4) |
| 1st set W, W | 85% (20/17) | 25% (4/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 15% (20/3) | 75% (4/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 32% (22/7) | 0% (5/0) |
Matthew Hulme Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Filip Peliwo
Player
Matthew Hulme
66%
(
71 of
107)
1st Serve %
59%
(
57 of
97)
0
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
66%
(
47 of
71)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
30 of
57)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
17 of
40)
33%
(
7 of
21)
Break Points Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
39%
(
42 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
50 of
97)
115
Total Points Won
89
|
6-2 6-7(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-4 2-6 13-11 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Alex Knaff
Player
Matthew Hulme
58%
(
54 of
93)
1st Serve %
60%
(
56 of
93)
6
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
80%
(
43 of
54)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
35 of
56)
56%
(
22 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
30%
(
28 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
33 of
93)
98
Total Points Won
88
|
6-1 3-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matt Kuhar
Player
Matthew Hulme
58%
(
38 of
65)
1st Serve %
65%
(
49 of
75)
3
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
5
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
38 of
49)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
6 of
26)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
29%
(
19 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
31 of
75)
77
Total Points Won
63
|
6-0 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Phoenix Weir
Player
Matthew Hulme
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve %
75%
(
44 of
59)
7
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
90%
(
28 of
31)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
23%
(
11 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
66
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Finn Bass
Player
Matthew Hulme
67%
(
40 of
60)
1st Serve %
65%
(
36 of
55)
1
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
0
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
75%
(
15 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
12 of
19)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
17 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
21 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matthew Hulme
Player
Luke Simkiss
76%
(
77 of
101)
1st Serve %
71%
(
66 of
93)
9
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
74%
(
57 of
77)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
45 of
66)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
34%
(
34 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
33 of
93)
100
Total Points Won
94
|
4-6 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Matthew Hulme
Player
Michael Shaw
61%
(
34 of
56)
1st Serve %
74%
(
48 of
65)
2
Aces
3
-
Double Faults
-
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
20 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
30 of
65)
66
Total Points Won
55
|
6-1 3-6 10-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Matthew Hulme
Player
Fabio Nestola
76%
(
53 of
70)
1st Serve %
54%
(
28 of
52)
6
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
26 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
70
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kenny de Schepper
Player
Matthew Hulme
70%
(
43 of
61)
1st Serve %
69%
(
46 of
67)
4
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
5
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
37 of
46)
83%
(
15 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
12 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
23 of
67)
72
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
view more
Luke Simkiss Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Miguel Damas
Player
Luke Simkiss
65%
(
45 of
69)
1st Serve %
59%
(
37 of
63)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
35%
(
24 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
63)
73
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Joe Tyler
Player
Luke Simkiss
76%
(
61 of
80)
1st Serve %
70%
(
46 of
66)
8
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
72%
(
44 of
61)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
34 of
46)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
34%
(
27 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
23 of
66)
76
Total Points Won
70
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matthew Hulme
Player
Luke Simkiss
76%
(
77 of
101)
1st Serve %
71%
(
66 of
93)
9
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
74%
(
57 of
77)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
45 of
66)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
34%
(
34 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
33 of
93)
100
Total Points Won
94
|
4-6 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ronetto Van Tilburg
Player
Luke Simkiss
52%
(
44 of
85)
1st Serve %
61%
(
59 of
96)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
40 of
59)
46%
(
19 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
13 of
37)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
40%
(
34 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
43 of
96)
94
Total Points Won
87
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 1-6 7-5 10-6 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 4-6 7-6(5) 10-8 | H2H | |||
| Q2 |
Stats
Thomas Deschamps
Player
Luke Simkiss
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve %
49%
(
25 of
51)
4
Aces
3
-
Double Faults
-
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
80%
(
12 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
20%
(
9 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
22 of
51)
57
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Adam Jones
Player
Luke Simkiss
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve %
63%
(
52 of
83)
7
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
36 of
52)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
12 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
34 of
83)
74
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Eero Vasa
Player
Luke Simkiss
51%
(
20 of
39)
1st Serve %
54%
(
21 of
39)
6
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
85%
(
17 of
20)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
10 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
52
Total Points Won
26
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Hulme Vs Simkiss Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Hulme are available here and Simkiss photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
